VIRTUAL EXHIBITION

On behalf of ARQUITECTUM, a firm dedicated to the organization of Architecture Contests, we are glad to present the “Virtual Exhibition” of the "VENICE 2006" International Architecture Contest that contains all of the presented and winning projects.



SUMMARY:

ARQUITECTUM is the first International Agency dedicated to organize the best competitions in the best places of the world. Our mission is to promote excellence in design and architectural creativity, giving exposure to architects interested in these kinds of objectives. Our vision not only includes the organization of private architectural projects but also that of International Idea Competitions that stimulate architects to speculate and to create with the least amount of restrictions possible, in the most enigmatic, unique and beautiful settings around the world.
For our 1st Urban Contest we have gone too much further: we effectively brought the contest’s winning architect closer to the possibility that their project became part of the valuable studies that a city takes into consideration. On this occasion we have managed to get the authorities of Venice to review the winning proposal, and that the exhibition and awards ceremony itself takes place in Venice, at the IUAV - Istituto Universitario di Architettura di Venezia, so that it is going to be appreciated by all architects, authorities, academicians, as well as tourists and citizens of Venice from September 28th 2006 till October 15th 2006.

ARQUITECTUM carry out all the expenses for the 1st prize travel and permanency in Venice, so he –and his team- could assist to the Exhibition as well as the “Architecture Biennale 2007”.

uiav
UIAV Pavilion Entry

muestra de proyectos
Projects Exhibition room

arquitectos
Architects Alfredo Queirolo (General Manager of ARQUITECTUM), Architect Armando Dal Fabro (jury’s member) and Architect Manuel Fernandez de Luco (winner team member)

ganadores
Members of the 1st winner prize and of the 3rd prize (respectively)

The convocatory for the contest was made in March 2006. The contest started the same year in April and registrations were closed in July. The due date to present the digital projects in Venice was July 24th, 2006. The last evaluation was carried out on July and August, and the announcement of the winning projects on September 1st , 2006.Before that, we arrange so every interested architect could download for free all the necessary files that would help them to understand the place and specifically to achieve the competitions goal. Those files were:

planos
Site Plans (.dwg)

satelitales
Satellite Pictures (.jpg)

sitio
Site Pictures (.jpg)


History (.pdf)

documentos

documentos2
1985  Venice Architecture Biennale documents (.pdf)


PROJECTS:

ARQUITECTUM received 484 projects (involving more of 1000 architects and teams around the world) from the next countries:

  • Algeria
  • Argentina
  • Australia
  • Austria
  • Belgium
  • Bolivia
  • Bosnia
  • Brazil
  • Bulgaria
  • Canada
  • Chile
  • China
  • Colombia
  • Czech Republic
  • Denmark
  • Ecuador
  • Egypt
  • France
  • Georgia
  • Germany
  • Greece
  • Hong Kong
  • Hungary
  • India
  • Indonesia
  • Ireland
  • Iran
  • Israel
  • Italy
  • Japan
  • Korea
  • Lebanon
  • Lithuania
  • Macedonia
  • Malaysia
  • Malta
  • Mexico
  • Pakistan
  • Perú
  • Poland
  • Portugal
  • Puerto Rico
  • Russian federeation
  • Romany
  • Serbia & Montenegro
  • Singapore
  • Slovenia
  • Spain
  • Stonia
  • Syria
  • South Africa
  • Sweden
  • Switzerland
  • Thailand
  • Taiwan
  • The Netherlands
  • Turkey
  • Ukraine
  • United Kingdom
  • Uruguay
  • U.S.A.
  • Venezuela
  • Vietnam



JURY:

The jury was represented by:
Representing the Venice Municipality:
Roberto D'Agostino, president of the Arsenale Society SPA (Urban Strategic Project Development) principal stockholder of the Venice Municipality (ITALY).
Representing the IUAV- University Institute of Architecture of Venice:
Arch.Gustavo Carabajal, architect: President of the Jury (ITALY) 
Arch. Gianni Fabri: (ITALIA)
Arch. Armando Dal Fabbro: (ITALIA)

Who has arrived to the next verdict:

The winning project demonstrates with clarity and coherence the idea of an “original” Venice. Taking as a starting point the pre-Palladian idea (lineal and amphibian) the project tackles the clear and simple proposal of the subject of the “inhabited bridge”. Its simplicity and composite coherence are based on the amphibious idea of the “isolated” city. The city of stone evoked in the Carpaccio painting deals with “foundational” Venice trying to recover the sense of the historic and stylistic of the “romantic” memory.
Coherence, simplicity, expressive strength: these are the elemental principals that can be seen in this project strategy.
The second project has been rewarded for its strong conceptual sensitivity. It deals with the subject of the “fragility” of the urban Venetian fabric, proposing a transparent building, strongly characterised by its constituent element (glass) and material (or immaterial). The idea of the bridge is interpreted as an imposing surprise: the project challenges the monumental simplicity of the city with “the architecture of transparency”, lightness and reflection. It is a palace of lightweight glass, “weightless” against the water, uniting two worlds without contradicting them and permitting a dialogue.
The third project distinguishes itself by virtue of being an elegant proposal of how to build, for that part of Venice, a “magnetic” and “circulatory” centre at the point where the city is suddenly interrupted. The bridge proposes itself as a “plaza of water”, not only because it crosses the Canal, creating a “node” – where the bridge and the museum are continuously fused like a vertex – but also creating, above all, an undulating ring the centre of which devours the city. In this way, through a clean solution, the project manages with a single gesture to unite the water – like a tornado – with the upper part – virtual – of the city.”

WINNERS: 

The projects selected by the jury were the following:

1st PRIZE: 3125
Arch. Manuel Fernandez de Luco
Arch. Marcelo Degiovanni.
Arch. Luis Lleonart
Arch. Milena Alessio.
Fernanda Cardona.
Ariadna Maskiver.
Natalia Sosa.
ARGENTINA

2nd PRIZE : 2503
Arch. Totan Kuzembaev
Arch. Danir Saifiulin
Arch. Oljas Kuzembaev
RUSSIAN FEDERATION

3er PRIZE : 718
Arch. Francisco Caseiro
Arch. Diego Calderón
Arch. Giacomo Brenna
Arch. Sofía Torres Pereira
PORTUGAL-ITALY-MEXICO

1st MENTION (Utopist Project): 507
Arch. Aneta Hristova-Popovska
Arch. Zivko Popovski
REPUBLIC OF MACEDONIA

2nd MENTION (Poetic Project): 422 y 3053
Raphaël Gabrion
FRANCE
Anthony Coupe
AUSTRALIA

3rd MENTION (Historicist Project): 3177
Ana Valderrama
ARGENTINA

4th MENTION (Technological Project): 2806
Francisco Gomes
PORTUGAL

5th MENTION (Contextual Project): 222 y 2971
Bárbara Fernández
Bruno Campos
BRASIL
Giuseppe Vultaggio
ITALY

6th MENTION (Conservative Project): 2262
Yuval Knaani
Daniel Ohana
Gilad Lan
ISRAEL

7th MENTION ( Minimalist Project): 1034
Anibal Moline
ARGENTINA

8th MENTION (Institucional Project): 2913
Andrea Libovich
Diego Schmukler
Silvina Mocci
Virginia Hirschfeld
Diego Silva
Fabio Caracciolo
ARGENTINA

9th MENTION (Virtual Project) : 2313
Kyongsik Jun
U.S.A.

ARQUITECTUM would like to thank the generous collaboration of all the companies involved in the promotion, sponsoring and diffusion of the "VENICE 2006" contest, as well as the distinguish members of the jury, without whom it would have been impossible to carry out this project.
Furthermore, we extend our congratulations to all the winners, as well as our gratefulness to all the participants worldwide.

Thank you very much.


Architect Silvia Telaya
Professional Advisor
VENICE 2006

         
       
  www.arkinka.com.pe  
         
     
         
     
         
labienale  
       


WINNERS:
The projects selected by the jury were the following:

FIRST PRIZE
Argentina
SECOND PRIZE
Russian Federation
THIRD PRIZE
Portugal-Italy-Mexico
1st mention
Utopist project
Republic of Macedonia
2nd mention
Poetic project
Australia
2nd mention
Poetic project
France
3rd mention
Historicist Project
Argentina
4th mention
Technological Project
Portugal
5th mention
Contextual Project
Italy
5th mention
Contextual project
Brazil
6th mention
Conservative project
Israel
7th mention
Minimalist project
Argentina
8th mention
Institucional Project
Argentina
9th mention
Virtual Project
USA
 
 

PARTICIPANTS:

 
112 122 126 132 135
139 141 154 172 180
196 207 208 210 211
225 290 296 299 303
316 318 320 321 352
354 355 358 370 391
401 407 416 418 427
443 452 461 470 481
487 498 508 518 525
532 536 559 564 576
579 586 587 588 592
598 616 618 638 652
657 673 676 690 692
700 707 714 719 724
747 764 765 779 781
789 811 813 814 820
822 837 844 848 849
850 853 854 856 863
864 866 884 885 892
903 913 914 915 918
919 941 948 976 982
985 1008 1017 1027 1028
1029 1035 1039 1048 1054
1058 1063 1083 1091 1098
1102 1105 1109 1112 1116
1117 1122 1127 1159 1171
1172 1173 1215 1216 1228
1230 1231 1232 1236 1237
1241 1245 1246 1267 1272
1273 1274 1302 1310 1325
1346 1362 1370 1374 1381
1400 1428 1430